@avivc @jmaelbrancke @Terence_Chuen this fix is going to be part of 5.2.2 and it should be available for download rather soon from https://www.elastic.co/downloads/elasticsearch
2 Likes
@avivc we don't announce release dates internally or externally because so many different things can cause these to shift. I'll update this ticket if I hear anything else.
Fair enough!
Tnx
Thank you for notifying,I will check repo and update.
I will report here again after the update.
@avivc
I think it should be.
The version of all packages should be consistent.
@Brandon_Kobel
I upgraded and tested, the function has returned to normal.
Thank you.
1 Like
@avivc you'll want to keep the version of ES/Kibana in sync to ensure you don't hit any compatibility issues.
1 Like
I think this can be worked around by tying up the visualization to a search , and include the regular expression as part of the search .
Refactor all index based visualization to depend on a search instead and have the regex filter as a part of search query.
@Vinoth_Ravi do you mean -
Taking the visualize json request and add it regex
OR
Export data from the dev tools (myIndex/_search) and add it regex for the new query
?
You have an example for this?
It is possible to double-click on entity in visualize and it open an action bar to filter data
Tnx 
Lets say we have an export of all the search, viz and dashboard objects from kibana 5.1.2.
Import this into 5.2.1 by any means - either directly putting it in .kibana index or import ( if it succeeds ).
grep for "exclude" "include" keywords from the export.json and find 'affected' viz.
Open each of the affected viz, remove the regex pattern from "include/exclude" and add it to the search bar at the top. For example, if field_1 has regex include like .*ERROR.*|*.WARN.* , remove it and place in the search at the top as field_1: *ERROR* OR field_1: *WARN*.
( Note if the viz was already linked to a search, double click to unlink it and edit the search tab directly).
I tried this and it works okay, but only 10% of my Viz are affected ( which used exclude/include pattern ) so it is feasible workaround for me.
Cool @Vinoth_Ravi !
For what you have tried, does it stays for good? I mean, once you've add the regex to the search field instead in the include/ exclude box..
In that case it case be useful, but if not it might be a beat tedious right ?
Yes, the fix is clean.
This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.