I'm testing out the Kibana Graph feature and am running into an issue. I would expect the KQL field to limit the search, however, it appears that this doesn't happen. Anyone know why?
Example below, I would not expect this response at all if KQL was being applied:
@BenB196
The KQL 'search` is within the query context but you're assuming a filter context. Queries effect the search result score, while filters only answer the 'does it match or not' question.
Here's a link to the docs.
I looked at that as well, but found it to do the opposite of what I wanted. It will only block a specific term, if I have 1000 terms, but only want to show 1, then I'll need to block 999 terms individually, which I don't think is particularly feasible.
Don't think that's the right solution as it would then limit the amount of values that I can get. I guess my original example was kind of bad. A better example would be I want to show all emails with the subject that contain *Stock#*, and I don't want to include anything else. I've found that if I limit sample_size it will initially return accurate values, but won't return all possible values, and if I expand the sample size, it will stop show relevant info, while not showing all possible values. Maybe this use case isn't really supported by Graph currently? Do you think vega would provide a better solution for this use case: https://vega.github.io/vega/examples/force-directed-layout/?
@BenB196 I don't know Vega at all but I hear it can perform what I call 'magic'! There's cetainly a lot of documentation available and the examples are great
Good luck!
Apache, Apache Lucene, Apache Hadoop, Hadoop, HDFS and the yellow elephant
logo are trademarks of the
Apache Software Foundation
in the United States and/or other countries.