YuWatanabe
(Yu Watanabe)
December 4, 2022, 9:31am
1
Hello .
Walking through the document and came up with below thought. NIT though.
Kibana doc suggest user to MANUALLY to compare checksum ,where elasticsearch doc do this automatically in shasum command .
I thought it might be better for kibana to do it the same way as elasticsearch for people who are using automation tools .
Thanks,
Yu Watanabe
2 Likes
jsanz
(Jorge Sanz)
December 27, 2022, 4:09pm
2
Thanks for the suggestion @YuWatanabe . I totally agree that both documentations should be aligned so I've opened a PR in the Kibana repo with this suggestion
elastic:main
← jsanz:docs/compare-sha-rpm
opened 04:07PM - 27 Dec 22 UTC
## Summary
Following this [recommendation](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/check… sum-confirmation-during-kibana-installation-for-rpm/320425) from a community member, this PR aligns the instructions to install Kibana from RPM with [Elasticsearch documentation](https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/b7060bad9a837d05973d96745db7a485a61bc148/docs/reference/setup/install/rpm.asciidoc?plain=1#L114-L117) to also download the checksum file and use `shasum` to run the test and confirm the file is correct.
No nit is small enough
system
(system)
Closed
January 25, 2023, 1:28am
4
This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.